![]() Also, Rhino is bad ass and is made by an awesome company worth supporting, unlike ADSK. Patches are free and updates are cheap and infrequent, and you get to have access to the software and your data forever. It dominates the market, but not everyone needs all that power. If you just need to be able to generate dumb models for export and/or generate drawings from them, buy a perpetual license for Rhino for $900. In contrast, Solidworks is more powerful, more feature-rich, more customizable, and more complex. But if that is the case, then Fusion, SolidWorks, Inventor or any other parametric CAD modeler are entirely unnecessary and costly. So, both Fusion 360 vs Solidworks offer cloud storage. It is true that many have no need for this capability. Fusion 360 also provides a view-only app for Android and iOS devices to see your project from smartphones. ![]() Having to make those changes directly to a dumb model while manually accounting for all of the complex relationships of the model within a larger assembly is time consuming and prone to error. The primary difference between Solidworks and Fusion 360 is that one is a parametric modeling program (Solidworks) while the other is an integrated CAD/CAM. Model revisions are a fact of life, and often times are required years after the initial design to incorporate a small material or standard hardware change due to supply chain issues or to fix issues with the fielded final product. How a models dimensions and constraints relate to each other is every bit or more important to the designer than the resulting dumb geometry. Solidworks is a user-friendly 3D modeling software designed for mechanical engineering, while Fusion 360 is a more affordable option suitable for electronics. If a model or assembly is parametric, then it contains design intent. Doing organic shapes in rhino takes a few weeks of practice. Doing organic shapes properly in fusion takes years of practice. ![]() When comparing quality of ongoing product support. Basically fusion is better for iterative design and rhino is better for surfacing. Reviewers felt that Fusion 360 meets the needs of their business better than Creo Parametric. En este video vemos el nuevo ofrecimiento de solidworks para competir con Fusion 360. Reviewers also preferred doing business with Fusion 360 overall. Besides, working as a machinist, I have yet to meet a designer that bothers to take the time and include design intent in their assemblies. When assessing the two solutions, reviewers found Fusion 360 easier to use, set up, and administer. SolidWorks Use Cases and Applications SolidWorks is a powerful tool suite, but its origins as a machine design package (rather than an aesthetic one) are still evident. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |